Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Approaches in Theologizing in Asia

Daniel Franklin E. Pilario

Abstract


This article attempts to answer the question how interdisciplinary is theology in the Asian context? It tackles the issue in three distinct parts: (1) the notion of interdisciplinarity; (2) the relationship between theology and other disciplines; and (3) the principles and practices of interdisciplinary theologizing in Asia. First, interdisciplinarity feeds on the concept of scientific disciplinarity. Though “disciplines” as domains of knowledge exist from the Greeks to the scholastics, disciplinary specialization is a modern creation. The subsequent scientific compartmentalization longed for a synthesis, thus, leading to the varied ways of relating among scientific disciplines expressed in terms like interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. The second part of the article maps how theology has dealt with its “other” throughout history. The third section argues for the dialogical character of both Asian cultures and Asian Christianities. Finding themselves in a land characterized by plural philosophies and religions, it cannot exist but be in dialogue with others. In the Asian continent, the serenity of the lotus meets the defiance of the cross bringing out a theology that expresses both harmony and prophecy, equilibrium and transformation. The article ends by showing methodological principles, theological methods, present practitioners and emerging questions generated by this complex interdisciplinary interaction on the Asian soil. 

Abstrak

Artikel ini berusaha menjawab pertanyaan bagaimana teologi interdisipliner dijalankan dalam konteks Asia? Ada tiga isu yang digarap: (1) makna interdisiplinaritas; (2) keterpautan antara teologi dan disiplin lain; (3) prinsip dan praksis berteologi interdisipliner di Asia. Bagian pertama menggali interdisiplinaritas dalam ilmu-ilmu. Keanekaragaman ilmu-ilmu disimak mulai dari periode filsafat Yunani hingga Skolastik. Ilmu-ilmu modern mendistingsi “keilmiahan” dalam interdisiplinaritas, multidisiplinaritas, dan transdisiplinaritas. Bagian kedua membahas bagaimana teologi mengurus “yang lain” dalam sejarah. Bagian ketiga berargumentasi terkait dengan karakter dialogal dari keduanya, yaitu baik kultur Asia maupun Kekristenan Asia. Karena mendarat di tanah yang bercirikan filsafat dan kebudayaan yang beraneka macam, Kekristenan Asia tidak mungkin melepaskan diri dari dialog dengan yang lain. Di benua Asia, kedamaian lotus berjumpa dengan penebusan salib yang produknya mengukir harmoni dan kritisi, keseimbangan dan transformasi. Artikel berakhir dengan prinsip-prinsip metodologis, metode teologis dari para praktisi saat ini, dan pertanyaan-pertanyaan penting yang muncul dari interaksi interdisipliner yang kompleks di tanah Asia.


Keywords


multidisciplinarity; transdisciplinarity; Asian philosophies; Asian religions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aquinas, S. T. (2013). Summa Theologica, Volume 5 (Part III, Second Section & Supplement). Cosimo, Inc.

Black, B., & Patton, L. (2015). Dialogue in Early South Asian Religions: Hindu, Buddhist and Jain Traditions. London and New York: Routledge.

Benson, Joshua C. 2009. Identifying the Literary Genre of the “De reductione artium ad theologiam”: Bonaventure's Inaugural Lecture at Paris. Franciscan Studies 69, 149-178.

Bourdieu, B., & Wacquant. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice, trans. Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Brazal, Agnes M., Pilario, Daniel F. E. (2007). Disciplines, Interdisciplinary and Theology. Hapág A Journal of Interdisciplinary Theological Research 4(1), 5–25.

Congar, Y. M. (1968). A History of Theology, trans. And ed. Hunter Guthrie. Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company.

Congregation for the Clergy. (2016). The Gift of the Priestly Vocation. Ratio Fundamentalis Institutionis Scaerdotalis. http://www.clerus.va/content/dam/clerus/Ratio%20Fundamentalis/The%20Gift%20of%20the%20Priestly%20Vocation.pdf

de Mello, A. (1981). The Song of the Bird. New York: Doubleday.

FABC. (1974). Evangelization in Modern Day Asia,” (Statement and Recommendations of the First Plenary Assembly). Hong Kong: Office of the Secretary-General.

FABC-Office of Theological Concerns. (2000). Methodology: Asian Christian Theology. Hong Kong: Office of the Secretary-General.

FABC-Theological Advisory Council. (1996). Asian Christian Perspectives on Harmony. Hong Kong: Office of the Secretary-General.

Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. Harmondworth: Penguin.

Foucault, M. (1998). A Preface to Transgression,” in Michel Foucault, Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, ed. James Faubion. New York: New York Pres.

Fuller, S., & Collier, J. H. (2004). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: A New Beginning for Science and Technology Studies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gaudium et spes. (1965). Retrieved June 27, 2020, from http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html

Heidegger, M. (1977). Science and Reflections,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. William Lovett. New York: Harper and Row.

Instruction on Certain Aspects of Theologies of Liberation. (1984). Retrieved June 27, 2020, http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_1984080 6_theology-liberation_en.html

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for Transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4), 515-526.

Klein, Julie Thompson. (2017). Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition, The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd ed., ed. Robert Frodeman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1977). The Differentiation of Society. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 2(1), 29-53.

Milbank, J. (1990). Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. Oxford: Balckwell.

Milbank, J., & Pickstock, C. (2001). Truth in Aquinas. London: Routledge.

Office of Theological Concerns, F. (2002). Methodology: Asian Christian Theology, For All the Peoples of Asia, V.3 ed. Franz-Josej Eilers. Manila: Claretian.

Panikkar, R. (2010). The Rhythm of Being. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Pieris, A. (1988). Love Meets Wisdom: A Christian Experience of Buddhism. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Sen, A. (2005). The Argumentative Indian. London: Penguin Books.

Simon, H. (1992). Living in Interdisciplinary Space, Eminent Economists: Their Life and Philosophies, ed. M. Szenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

St. Vincent School of Theology. (n.d.). Sexual Violence Against Women: Interdisciplinary Theological Conversations. Manila: Adamson University.

Wilfred, Felix. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Christianity in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilfred, F. (2013). On the Future of Asian Theology: Public Theologizing, in idem. (Ed), Theology to go Public. Delhi: ISPCK.

Wilfred, F. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Christianity in Asia. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, S., & Constantinovits, M. (2016). A Study of Principled Negotiation Based on Chinese Harmony Thought. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution 7(1), 60-70.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47043/ijipth.v1i1.4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel Franklin E. Pilario

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats IJIPTh

 

Abstract and Indexing By: